Copyright © 2004-2010 The Professor Network. Some Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners. By accessing this site or its contents you agree to the below terms.
Any theory which says that to know a truth one must believe it and one's belief must stand in a certain causal relation to the truth itself.
For example, I know that Caesar crossed the Rubicon if his doing so caused some historian to write a book saying so, which caused my local library to buy it, which caused me to read and believe it.
The causal connection might be more complex than a simple chain, and the knower might have to make some inferences.
Objections include the case of timeless truths like those of mathematics, which do not seem to cause anything; and the possibility that the causal chain might be of the wrong sort, so that intuitively one would not say that here was a case of knowledge. (This entry ignores the distinction between facts and events).
Source:
A I Goldman, 'A Causal Theory of Knowing', Journal of Philosophy (1967)
Have a Say?
Submit additional
information | Correct Mistakes