Claim that inference in accordance with some version of the inductive principle is, if not logically valid, at least rationally legitimate.
Objections to it include those mentioned under uniformity of nature and Goodman’s paradox.
Source:
R Swinburne, ed., The Justification of Induction (1974)
Table of Contents
- 1 Videos
- 2 Related Products
- 2.1 J.S. Mill on Inductivism: An appraisal of Scientific Methodology: A critique of the scientific methodological absolutism
- 2.2 Research Methods for Business and Social Science Students
- 2.3 SYNTHESE AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR EPISTEMOLOGY, METHODOLOGY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE: ON INDUCTION AND INDUCTIVISM --HOLLAND
- 2.4 Analytic Philosophy of Religion: its History since 1955
- 2.5 Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. and Legal Logic
- 2.6 Contemporary Philosophy of Religion (Philosophy Insights)
- 2.7 What Is This Thing Called Science?
- 2.8 The Logic of Scientific Discovery (Routledge Classics)
- 2.9 The Structure of Scientific Revolutions: 50th Anniversary Edition
- 2.10 Philosophy of Science in the Twentieth Century: Four Central Themes
Last update 2020-06-17. Price and product availability may change.