Any of a variety of views all of which are consequentialist or teleological, being distinguished from other forms of consequentialism (if any) by saying that the consequence to be pursued is the maximization of good.
This maximization may refer to the greatest total good or the greatest average good, but the slogan ‘greatest good of the greatest number’ is ambiguous. (See Bentham’s theory of utilitarianism.) Utilitarianism is always universalistic, not egoistic or altruistic.
Utilitarianism may be divided into act and rule utilitarianism, into hedonistic, ideal, and preference utilitarianism, and also into ordinary and negative utilitarianism: these divisions cutting across each other. Utilitarians distinguish the lightness of an action, which depends on its actual consequences (or those of the relevant rule, for rule utilitarians), from the moral goodness of the agent, which depends on his motives and intentions.
Objections have usually centred on the practicality of utilitarianism (especially act utilitarianism) in view of our limited predictive powers; and on whether it can cater for our intuition about justice and ‘backward-looking’ obligations like that of promise-keeping.
Our ability to control population numbers also raises issues.
Source:
J J C Smart and B Williams, Utilitarianism For and Against (1973)
Table of Contents
- rule utilitarianism
- Act utilitarianism
- preference utilitarianism
- negative utilitarianism
- consequentialism
Last update 2020-06-17. Price and product availability may change.